DMARC is no longer
optional

Whether you're protecting a single domain or managing hundreds for clients, you need reliable visibility into who is sending email on your behalf — and whether it's passing authentication.

You need monitoring
to enforce policy safely

DMARC itself is free — it's a DNS record and an open standard. The aggregate reports are free — receiving mail servers send them automatically. What costs money is making sense of those reports at scale, consistently, over time.

The question isn't whether you can afford DMARC monitoring. It's whether you can afford to enforce a policy without it.

Moving from p=none to p=reject without monitoring is how legitimate mail gets blocked. You need to understand every sending source before you tighten policy — and you need to keep watching after you do.

DMARC itself is free — it's a DNS record and an open standard. The aggregate reports are free — receiving mail servers send them automatically. What costs money is making sense of those reports at scale, consistently, over time. That's where a monitoring service earns its keep.

OnlyDMARC
DMARC Monitoring Platform
The safe policy journey
p=none
Monitor only
p=quarantine
Tighten gradually
p=reject
Full enforcement

Each step requires monitoring to make safely. OnlyDMARC alerts you to unknown senders before they get blocked.

A basic DMARC record looks like this

One line of DNS, zero risk to existing delivery:

v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:reports@yourdomain.com

That rua= address is where your aggregate reports go. Without monitoring, those reports are just XML sitting on a server nobody reads.

Regulatory requirements
are catching up fast

Across payment processing, financial services, and public sector, DMARC has moved from best-practice guidance to mandatory requirement. Here's the landscape.

PCI DSS v4.0
Section 5.4.1 mandates anti-phishing mechanisms including DMARC, SPF, and DKIM for all entities processing cardholder data.
Effective: 31 March 2025

Applies to: retail & e-commerce, hospitality, healthcare, professional services, SaaS platforms, nonprofits — any organisation accepting card payments.

EU DORA
The Digital Operational Resilience Act imposes comprehensive ICT risk management and resilience testing requirements on financial entities and their technology suppliers.
Effective: January 2025

DMARC is increasingly viewed as a baseline indicator of cyber maturity in regulated sectors. Not optional if you operate in or serve the European financial ecosystem.

Government Mandates
UK, US, Denmark, Canada, and Australia all have active DMARC requirements for government domains. BOD 18-01 (US DHS, 2017) requires p=reject across all federal civilian agencies.
Active since: 2016 (UK), 2017 (US)

Suppliers and contractors to government bodies face the same expectations from procurement teams and auditors.

Google & Yahoo
Bulk senders to Gmail and Yahoo must have a published DMARC record at p=none or stronger. Once classified as a bulk sender, that classification is permanent. Must also support one-click unsubscribe and keep spam complaint rates below 0.3%.
Effective: February 2024

Threshold: 5,000 emails per day to personal accounts. Note: 5,000 is per day — not per month. A product launch or seasonal campaign can push you over on any single day.

Microsoft
Outlook.com, Hotmail.com, and Live.com all apply DMARC requirements to bulk senders. Announced April 2025 with enforcement beginning 5 May 2025. Non-compliant messages are rejected with SMTP error 550; 5.7.515. Consumer mailboxes only — Microsoft 365 business addresses are not in scope.
Effective: 5 May 2025

Same 5,000-per-day threshold as Google and Yahoo. If you're already compliant for Gmail, you're likely already covered for Microsoft too.

Apple (iCloud Mail)
Apple published a best-practice guide shortly after the Google and Yahoo announcements, signalling the same authentication requirements. No hard enforcement deadline set, but the direction is clear: iCloud Mail is moving toward mandatory DMARC for bulk senders.
Status: Best practice — enforcement pending

If you send to iCloud addresses, now is the time to get compliant before a formal deadline is announced.

What “Required” actually
means in practice

Your email will be rejected

This is the inbox-provider reality. Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft will permanently reject or spam-folder your messages at the SMTP level if your domain doesn't meet their authentication standards. Non-compliant bulk email is rejected outright — not a theoretical risk, not a maybe.

You'll fail a compliance audit

This is the PCI DSS and government mandate scenario. An auditor checks for DMARC as part of their assessment. Its absence is a formal finding, potentially with financial penalties ($5,000–$100,000 under PCI DSS) or the loss of your ability to process card payments.

You'll be expected to have it

Cyber insurers, enterprise procurement teams, and industry regulators increasingly treat DMARC as a baseline expectation. Not having it creates friction in security assessments and raises questions about your overall security posture — even when no formal mandate applies.

In all three cases, the answer is the same: publish a DMARC record, set up monitoring, and work toward enforcement.

Still not sure?
Here's the summary

If you… DMARC is… Why
Send more than 5,000 emails/day to Gmail, Yahoo, or Outlook users Required Non-compliant messages are rejected at SMTP level
Accept credit or debit card payments Required PCI DSS v4.0 Section 5.4.1 mandates it — fines up to $100,000
Are a US federal agency or contractor Required DHS BOD 18-01 mandates p=reject
Are a UK government service Required GDS mandate — p=reject since 2016
Are a financial entity in the EU Expected DORA resilience requirements make it a practical necessity
Supply services to government or regulated entities Expected Their enforcement policies affect your email deliverability
Send any volume of email from a domain you care about Recommended Protects against spoofing and improves deliverability
Have a domain but don't send email from it Recommended A p=reject record prevents others from spoofing it

What happens without
DMARC enforcement?

Without a DMARC policy at quarantine or reject, anyone can spoof your domain in the visible From address — the name your recipients actually see. This is the vector used in business email compromise (BEC) and targeted phishing attacks.

  • Domain spoofing attacks
    Attackers send emails from your domain to your customers, partners, or staff — and mailbox providers can't tell the difference without DMARC enforcement.
  • Business email compromise (BEC)
    BEC is the #1 cause of cybercrime losses globally. The FBI's IC3 reports multi-billion dollar annual losses, the majority facilitated by email spoofing.
  • Brand reputation damage
    Every phishing email sent from your domain erodes trust with your customers. You may never know it happened without DMARC reporting.
  • Deliverability risk at reject
    Jumping straight to p=reject without monitoring means legitimate sources you've forgotten about will silently stop delivering. Monitoring makes the journey safe.
Without DMARC at p=reject
Spoofing protection None
Sending source visibility Partial
PCI DSS v4.0 compliance Fail
BIMI brand display eligibility Not eligible
With DMARC at p=reject + monitoring
Spoofing protection Full
Sending source visibility Complete
PCI DSS v4.0 compliance Pass
BIMI brand display eligibility Eligible

Built for every team size

Enterprises

Multiple domains, complex sending infrastructure, compliance requirements, and SOC teams that need DMARC data in their existing tooling — not another dashboard to watch.

MSSPs & Agencies

Manage DMARC monitoring across all your clients from a single platform. Per-domain configuration, alerting, and reporting. White-label friendly API.

Engineering Teams

REST API, MCP server, webhooks, and JSON export. Pipe DMARC data directly into your infrastructure. No SaaS lock-in, no forced workflow changes.

SMBs & Startups

Affordable, simple monitoring for a single domain. Get the compliance and security benefits of DMARC without needing a dedicated security team to manage it.

Financial Services

DORA, PCI DSS v4.0, and FCA expectations make DMARC monitoring a compliance necessity, not an optional security extra. We help you evidence it.

Public Sector

UK government and public sector bodies have been required to enforce DMARC since 2016. Suppliers and contractors increasingly face the same expectations.

Education

High email volumes across multiple subdomains and third-party senders make DMARC monitoring essential. Many students and alumni use personal Gmail or Yahoo accounts — exactly the inboxes covered by the bulk sender requirements.

Don't wait for an
incident to act

Request early access. No credit card required.